Is ‘Eco-Friendly’ Glitter Really That Eco-Friendly?

Scientists in the UK and elsewhere have called for a complete ban on glitter because they claim it takes thousands of years to break down when it pollutes the environment.

Researchers from Cambridgeshire warned, supposedly biodegradable glitter particles are just as toxic and can even encourage the spread of invasive species.

‘Many of the microplastics found in our rivers and oceans have taken years to form, as larger pieces of plastic are broken down over time,’ said paper author and ecologist Dannielle Green of the Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge.

‘However, glitter is a ready-made microplastic that is commonly found in our homes and — particularly through cosmetics — is washed off in our sinks and into the water system,’ she told the Daily Mail.

A study conducted by Dr Green and colleagues evaluated the impact of glitter on living freshwater habitats in a laboratory setting.

‘Our study is the first to look at the effects of glitter in a freshwater environment,’ explained Dr Green.

The study concluded that in glitter infested waters the root length of common duckweed was halved after five weeks of exposure to the micro-plastics pollution.

Chlorophyll levels in the water were also found to become three times lower than usual — suggesting the presence of fewer phytoplankton (microscopic organisms that provide food for a wide range of water creatures and absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere) or microalgae.

The team also evaluated the impact of so-called eco-friendly glitters which are made of materials such as mica, a flaky mineral, and modified regenerated cellulose.

While the latter is mainly sourced from eucalyptus trees, it is still coated in plastic, the researchers explained.

The team found that pollution from eco-friendly glitter was just as destructive to freshwater environments as its regular counterpart.

Dr Green concluded that “both conventional and alternative glitters can have a serious ecological impact on aquatic ecosystems within a short period of time.’ 

‘All types — including so-called biodegradable glitter — have a negative effect on important primary producers which are the base of the food web.’

‘Glitter with a biodegradable cellulose core has an additional impact of encouraging the growth of an invasive species.’

We believe these effects could be caused by leachate from the glitters, possibly from their plastic coating or other materials involved in their production, and our future research will investigate this in greater detail.’

The full findings of the study were published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials.

Featured content.

Can You Use Glycolic Acid Everyday?

It is generally not recommended to use glycolic acid every day, as it can be irritating to the skin. It is typically used once or twice a week. However, the frequency of use may vary depending on the concentration of the glycolic acid and the specific product that you are using. It is important to…

Keep reading

Niacinamide Vs Hyaluronic Acid

If you’ve followed Science and Skincare for any amount of time, you’ll be aware of my posts on acids. Niacinamide vs Hyaluronic Acid will be the highly requested addition to the category that made this site popular. Depending on your skincare knowledge, choosing between the two will either be easy or incredibly difficult. However, one…

Keep reading

Mandelic Acid vs Retinol

Mandelic Acid vs Retinol? Which one is right for you? Can you use both? If these are questions that have crossed your mind lately, then you’ve come to the right place. I’ve covered the topic of acids extensively and will continue to do so (because it is incredibly confusing and you have to be careful).…

Keep reading
%d bloggers like this: